We're glad to see that this time Samsung was able to get the injunction lifted but the fact remains that someone should be responsible for any lost sales during the time Samsung was not allowed to sell the tablet. If it never violated any patents or trademarks, than it would be unfair for Samsung to have lose in sales while it was determined, no matter how exciting the jury foreman thought it all was.
UPDATE : A friendly legal expert has informed me that Judge Koh has held the $2.6 million bond posted by Apple, and can in fact determine to award part or all of it to Samsung for a wrongfully issued injunction.
In the end it doesn't really matter, as the 10.1 has been replaced several times over by newer models. Consider this just another example of a biased and broken system, where only lawyers get to win.
In the end it doesn't really matter, as the 10.1 has been replaced several times over by newer models. Consider this just another example of a biased and broken system, where only lawyers get to win.
VIA : ANDROID CENTRAL
0 comments:
Post a Comment